100 GeV < v < 500 GeV
0.1 GeV^2/c^2 < Q^2 < 150 GeV^2/c^2
0.001 < Xbj < 0.5
I had continued to analyze data from this experiment, working at M.I.T. with Prof. Louis Osborne. We had two undergraduates working on theses on data from the last data collection period.
I designed and drafted the support frame for the muon proportional tubes for this experiment. This included elements for precise positioning of the proportional tubes in their frames. I procured the materials and ordered extrusions from a manufacturer of aluminum products. I managed the entire project, from bidding to machining and installation.
I also worked closely with a Fermilab engineer to design the support structure for these proportional tubes. I managed a crew of technicians and two other graduate students to assemble the frames and to install all the proportional tube detectors.
I designed and developed a method for ``deadening'' the high-intensity beam region of the proportional tubes. I machined and strung a test module, and I took measurements with cosmic rays to gauge the effect of the deadening.
I calculated a design for cooling the electronics of these proportional tubes by forcing air through the box-beams of the support frame. I took measurements to determine the power needed to force the air against the pressure head built-up in the box-beams.
I took responsibility for implementing and debugging the read-out electronics for the proportional tubes. I redesigned the interface between the electronics and the tubes to allow tolerance in attaching each channel. I debugged the digital control module which drove the multiplexed shift-out of the signals from the tubes. I traced down and fixed the faults in a number of the CAMAC RAM modules, which were to receive these signals. I also designed a clearing-house module which matched the various signal levels: TTL, ECL, and NIM. I managed a crew of collaborators in assembling and cabling the electronics to the proportional tube detectors.
I entered the software effort of pattern recognition of the data from our wire chambers. After defining precisely the efficiency of pattern recognition versus that of the chambers themselves, I helped tuned the parameters before the full reconstruction effort commenced.
E665 has investigated the relationship between diffractive scattering and the ``Shadowing'' effect. Shadowing is the reduction in the per-nucleon cross section as Xbj is decreased. We have scatterings off several nuclei at Xbj's down to 10^-5. We have published several papers on Shadowing and one on diffractive production of rho's. E665 investigated "Large Rapidity Gap" events. There is in the data a very strong correlation of Shadowing and diffraction. ``Most'' of the reduction in the total cross section at low-Xbj occurs in the diffractive component.
I am hoping to draw on this effort and information and work on the ZEUS Experiment, to gain a better understanding of the whole process.